09-24-2009, 08:40 AM
09-24-2009, 04:38 PM
Quality looks pretty below average?? Looks fun though!
09-24-2009, 07:55 PM
Look like great fun!
09-25-2009, 01:15 PM
yes fisheye is fun, and a proper fisheye lens is just sooo expensive for something that we won't use a lot.
so that lomo fisheye seems quite interesting
if you want a better quality and still relatively cheap fisheye, you can have a look at the Zenitar 16mm f/2.8 ..
Compare to that lomo fisheye it must be 100 times better. You probably won't use it at f/2.8 as it's quite soft at wide open, but it's definitely usable at f/4 and become quite sharp from f/5.6 onwards.. The colour/contrast seems not as good as my good Nikon lenses but it's like 1/3 to 1/5 the price of a good fisheye lens so i can live with that.
so that lomo fisheye seems quite interesting
if you want a better quality and still relatively cheap fisheye, you can have a look at the Zenitar 16mm f/2.8 ..
Compare to that lomo fisheye it must be 100 times better. You probably won't use it at f/2.8 as it's quite soft at wide open, but it's definitely usable at f/4 and become quite sharp from f/5.6 onwards.. The colour/contrast seems not as good as my good Nikon lenses but it's like 1/3 to 1/5 the price of a good fisheye lens so i can live with that.
09-28-2009, 10:31 PM
Yeah the quality looks pretty average, but the fun factor is definitely there... I guess it all depends on how much this is going to be sold for. Any idea?
11-25-2009, 09:44 PM
all camera I have to take their's photo ...... every with lomo fish eye also,..
so, which one camera u want to have a look, u pm for me..thanks for asking
so, which one camera u want to have a look, u pm for me..thanks for asking