I use my 70-200 alot and I find that I keep running out of reach and always wanting to go a little LONGER. How many of you use 200mm or 300mm and find that it is sufficient?
I do use the 70-200 on my D700 for portraits, people and landscape, but for sport I chuck it on the D90 to get extra 50% reach. I still find it is NOT enough!
Maybe time to get something with more reach?
Share your thoughts and experience!
200mm on a full frame camera is really not that long... definitely not enough!
on a DX camera, it's a lot better but of course i won't complain if i can get a bit more reach!
on the other hand, 200mm on my GF1 seems quite good
Never enough.
My 500 feels so short at times
(03-04-2010 05:50 PM)ArcspacE Wrote: [ -> ]Never enough.
My 500 feels so short at times
When you going to give us some sample shots?? I think the 150-500 seems like a good well priced alternative!!! Review + SHots please!! thanks!! haha
should try some teleconverters they will all fit onto your 70-200
. nikkor teleconverters are the best, and good range too.
(03-05-2010 07:34 PM)CTM Wrote: [ -> ] (03-04-2010 05:50 PM)ArcspacE Wrote: [ -> ]Never enough.
My 500 feels so short at times
When you going to give us some sample shots?? I think the 150-500 seems like a good well priced alternative!!! Review + SHots please!! thanks!! haha
Posted the review few months ago already, mate.
Should give it a proper run in a few weeks again so will update the thread.
Wooops, my bad! I just had a re-read! Thanks!